体质测试校园公开“四率”公示
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学学生 体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
2019 | 9.98% | 1 | 2020 | 48.72% | 1 | 2020 | 99.82% | 1 | 2020 | 25.73% | 1 |
2020 | 7.12% | 2 | 2019 | 48.24% | 2 | 2019 | 99.08% | 2 | 2019 | 43.44% | 2 |
2018 | 6.12% | 3 | 2017 | 40.09% | 3 | 2018 | 97.77% | 3 | 2018 | 54.73% | 3 |
2017 | 3.20% | 4 | 2018 | 36.55% | 4 | 2016 | 97.61% | 4 | 2017 | 61.62% | 4 |
2016 | 2.17% | 5 | 2016 | 30.43% | 5 | 2017 | 96.80% | 5 | 2016 | 70.22% | 5 |
2015 | 0.90% | 6 | 2015 | 15.80% | 6 | 2015 | 78.78% | 6 | 2015 | 74.72% | 6 |
总计 | 5.17% | 总计 | 37.43% | 总计 | 95.40% | 总计 | 53.80% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学2019年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1901 | 20.37% | 1 | 1901 | 62.96% | 1 | 1901 | 100.00% | 1 | 1901 | 35.19% | 1 |
1907 | 12.96% | 2 | 1906 | 56.36% | 2 | 1902 | 100.00% | 1 | 1905 | 35.19% | 1 |
1910 | 11.11% | 3 | 1904 | 53.70% | 3 | 1903 | 100.00% | 1 | 1908 | 37.04% | 3 |
1904 | 11.11% | 3 | 1903 | 50.00% | 4 | 1905 | 100.00% | 1 | 1902 | 38.89% | 4 |
1905 | 11.11% | 3 | 1902 | 48.15% | 5 | 1909 | 100.00% | 1 | 1910 | 38.89% | 4 |
1902 | 9.26% | 6 | 1909 | 48.15% | 5 | 1910 | 100.00% | 1 | 1906 | 41.82% | 6 |
1909 | 7.41% | 7 | 1910 | 44.44% | 7 | 1906 | 98.18% | 7 | 1907 | 44.44% | 7 |
1908 | 5.56% | 8 | 1905 | 44.44% | 7 | 1907 | 98.15% | 8 | 1903 | 44.44% | 7 |
1903 | 5.56% | 8 | 1907 | 38.89% | 9 | 1904 | 98.15% | 8 | 1909 | 53.70% | 9 |
1906 | 5.45% | 10 | 1908 | 35.19% | 10 | 1908 | 96.30% | 10 | 1904 | 64.81% | 10 |
总计 | 9.98% | 总计 | 48.24% | 总计 | 99.08% | 总计 | 43.44% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学2020年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
2010 | 16.36% | 1 | 2010 | 63.64% | 1 | 2004 | 100.00% | 1 | 2002 | 14.55% | 1 |
2008 | 12.96% | 2 | 2009 | 56.36% | 2 | 2005 | 100.00% | 1 | 2006 | 18.52% | 2 |
2006 | 11.11% | 3 | 2007 | 56.36% | 2 | 2006 | 100.00% | 1 | 2001 | 21.82% | 3 |
2009 | 10.91% | 4 | 2006 | 55.56% | 4 | 2007 | 100.00% | 1 | 2008 | 24.07% | 4 |
2001 | 9.09% | 5 | 2008 | 50.00% | 5 | 2008 | 100.00% | 1 | 2009 | 25.45% | 5 |
2002 | 3.64% | 6 | 2005 | 43.64% | 6 | 2009 | 100.00% | 1 | 2003 | 25.45% | 5 |
2005 | 3.64% | 6 | 2001 | 43.64% | 6 | 2010 | 100.00% | 1 | 2004 | 27.27% | 7 |
2003 | 1.82% | 8 | 2003 | 43.64% | 6 | 2001 | 100.00% | 1 | 2005 | 29.09% | 8 |
2004 | 1.82% | 8 | 2002 | 40.00% | 9 | 2002 | 100.00% | 1 | 2010 | 34.55% | 9 |
2007 | 0.00% | 10 | 2004 | 34.55% | 10 | 2003 | 98.18% | 10 | 2007 | 36.36% | 10 |
总计 | 7.12% | 总计 | 48.72% | 总计 | 99.82% | 总计 | 25.73% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学2018年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1807 | 11.11% | 1 | 1802 | 48.15% | 1 | 1802 | 100.00% | 1 | 1808 | 46.30% | 1 |
1809 | 9.26% | 2 | 1808 | 42.59% | 2 | 1806 | 100.00% | 1 | 1806 | 50.94% | 2 |
1810 | 7.55% | 3 | 1806 | 41.51% | 3 | 1807 | 98.15% | 3 | 1809 | 51.85% | 3 |
1801 | 7.41% | 4 | 1807 | 38.89% | 4 | 1808 | 98.15% | 3 | 1803 | 51.85% | 3 |
1802 | 7.41% | 4 | 1801 | 38.89% | 4 | 1801 | 98.15% | 3 | 1805 | 51.85% | 3 |
1806 | 5.66% | 6 | 1805 | 38.89% | 4 | 1805 | 98.15% | 3 | 1804 | 52.73% | 6 |
1805 | 3.70% | 7 | 1803 | 33.33% | 7 | 1804 | 96.36% | 7 | 1807 | 55.56% | 7 |
1808 | 3.70% | 7 | 1809 | 29.63% | 8 | 1803 | 96.30% | 8 | 1802 | 57.41% | 8 |
1804 | 3.64% | 9 | 1804 | 29.09% | 9 | 1809 | 96.30% | 8 | 1801 | 62.96% | 9 |
1803 | 1.85% | 10 | 1810 | 24.53% | 10 | 1810 | 96.23% | 10 | 1810 | 66.04% | 10 |
总计 | 6.12% | 总计 | 36.55% | 总计 | 97.77% | 总计 | 54.73% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学2017年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1703 | 7.84% | 1 | 1703 | 54.90% | 1 | 1704 | 100.00% | 1 | 1705 | 44.00% | 1 |
1705 | 6.00% | 2 | 1706 | 45.28% | 2 | 1707 | 100.00% | 1 | 1706 | 50.94% | 2 |
1706 | 5.66% | 3 | 1705 | 44.00% | 3 | 1706 | 98.11% | 3 | 1703 | 56.86% | 3 |
1707 | 3.70% | 4 | 1707 | 40.74% | 4 | 1709 | 98.11% | 3 | 1704 | 59.62% | 4 |
1704 | 1.92% | 5 | 1701 | 40.38% | 5 | 1705 | 98.00% | 5 | 1707 | 64.81% | 5 |
1701 | 1.92% | 5 | 1702 | 38.46% | 6 | 1701 | 96.15% | 6 | 1708 | 65.38% | 6 |
1702 | 1.92% | 5 | 1709 | 35.85% | 7 | 1703 | 96.08% | 7 | 1701 | 65.38% | 6 |
1708 | 0.00% | 8 | 1704 | 34.62% | 8 | 1708 | 92.31% | 8 | 1702 | 67.31% | 8 |
1709 | 0.00% | 8 | 1708 | 26.92% | 9 | 1702 | 92.31% | 8 | 1709 | 79.25% | 9 |
总计 | 3.20% | 总计 | 40.09% | 总计 | 96.80% | 总计 | 61.62% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学2016年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1604 | 7.69% | 1 | 1604 | 38.46% | 1 | 1601 | 100.00% | 1 | 1603 | 61.54% | 1 |
1602 | 5.88% | 2 | 1602 | 37.25% | 2 | 1606 | 100.00% | 1 | 1605 | 64.71% | 2 |
1609 | 4.00% | 3 | 1601 | 35.29% | 3 | 1603 | 98.08% | 3 | 1606 | 66.67% | 3 |
1603 | 1.92% | 4 | 1609 | 34.00% | 4 | 1604 | 98.08% | 3 | 1608 | 70.00% | 4 |
1601 | 0.00% | 5 | 1608 | 30.00% | 5 | 1605 | 98.04% | 5 | 1604 | 71.15% | 5 |
1605 | 0.00% | 5 | 1607 | 28.85% | 6 | 1608 | 98.00% | 6 | 1609 | 72.00% | 6 |
1606 | 0.00% | 5 | 1603 | 28.85% | 6 | 1609 | 98.00% | 6 | 1602 | 72.55% | 7 |
1607 | 0.00% | 5 | 1606 | 21.57% | 8 | 1607 | 94.23% | 8 | 1601 | 74.51% | 8 |
1608 | 0.00% | 5 | 1605 | 19.61% | 9 | 1602 | 94.12% | 9 | 1607 | 78.85% | 9 |
总计 | 2.17% | 总计 | 30.43% | 总计 | 97.61% | 总计 | 70.22% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学2015年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1507 | 4.08% | 1 | 1505 | 22.45% | 1 | 1507 | 89.80% | 1 | 1504 | 66.00% | 1 |
1502 | 2.04% | 2 | 1503 | 20.00% | 2 | 1508 | 83.67% | 2 | 1507 | 67.35% | 2 |
1505 | 2.04% | 2 | 1504 | 18.00% | 3 | 1505 | 81.63% | 3 | 1502 | 71.43% | 3 |
1506 | 0.00% | 4 | 1508 | 16.33% | 4 | 1504 | 80.00% | 4 | 1501 | 74.00% | 4 |
1503 | 0.00% | 4 | 1502 | 14.29% | 5 | 1501 | 78.00% | 5 | 1509 | 75.00% | 5 |
1504 | 0.00% | 4 | 1507 | 14.29% | 5 | 1502 | 77.55% | 6 | 1508 | 77.55% | 6 |
1508 | 0.00% | 4 | 1509 | 12.50% | 7 | 1509 | 77.08% | 7 | 1505 | 79.59% | 7 |
1509 | 0.00% | 4 | 1506 | 12.24% | 8 | 1503 | 74.00% | 8 | 1506 | 79.59% | 7 |
1501 | 0.00% | 4 | 1501 | 12.00% | 9 | 1506 | 67.35% | 9 | 1503 | 82.00% | 9 |
总计 | 0.90% | 总计 | 15.80% | 总计 | 78.78% | 总计 | 74.72% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学丹凤校区 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
2017 | 25.69% | 1 | 2017 | 72.48% | 1 | 2017 | 100.00% | 1 | 2020 | 17.78% | 1 |
2016 | 21.74% | 2 | 2016 | 68.48% | 2 | 2015 | 98.11% | 2 | 2016 | 21.74% | 2 |
2018 | 9.83% | 3 | 2019 | 57.82% | 3 | 2019 | 97.63% | 3 | 2019 | 36.02% | 3 |
2019 | 7.58% | 4 | 2018 | 45.66% | 4 | 2016 | 95.65% | 4 | 2018 | 53.76% | 4 |
2015 | 7.55% | 5 | 2015 | 40.57% | 5 | 2018 | 91.33% | 5 | 2017 | 56.88% | 5 |
2020 | 1.11% | 6 | 2020 | 28.33% | 6 | 2020 | 90.56% | 6 | 2015 | 61.32% | 6 |
总计 | 10.45% | 总计 | 50.17% | 总计 | 95.06% | 总计 | 39.95% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学丹凤校区2017年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1710 | 29.55% | 1 | 1701 | 73.85% | 1 | 1701 | 100.00% | 1 | 1710 | 54.55% | 1 |
1701 | 23.08% | 2 | 1710 | 70.45% | 2 | 1710 | 100.00% | 1 | 1701 | 58.46% | 2 |
总计 | 25.69% | 总计 | 72.48% | 总计 | 100.00% | 总计 | 56.88% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学丹凤校区2016年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1609 | 25.71% | 1 | 1601 | 71.93% | 1 | 1609 | 97.14% | 1 | 1609 | 8.57% | 1 |
1601 | 19.30% | 2 | 1609 | 62.86% | 2 | 1601 | 94.74% | 2 | 1601 | 29.82% | 2 |
总计 | 21.74% | 总计 | 68.48% | 总计 | 95.65% | 总计 | 21.74% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学丹凤校区2018年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1811 | 12.12% | 1 | 1810 | 53.62% | 1 | 1811 | 93.94% | 1 | 1812 | 35.29% | 1 |
1810 | 11.59% | 2 | 1811 | 51.52% | 2 | 1810 | 92.75% | 2 | 1813 | 54.05% | 2 |
1812 | 8.82% | 3 | 1812 | 35.29% | 3 | 1813 | 89.19% | 3 | 1810 | 57.97% | 3 |
1813 | 5.41% | 4 | 1813 | 35.14% | 4 | 1812 | 88.24% | 4 | 1811 | 63.64% | 4 |
总计 | 9.83% | 总计 | 45.66% | 总计 | 91.33% | 总计 | 53.76% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学丹凤校区2019年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1911 | 12.50% | 1 | 1911 | 62.50% | 1 | 1911 | 100.00% | 1 | 1910 | 30.30% | 1 |
1913 | 8.33% | 2 | 1913 | 58.33% | 2 | 1910 | 98.48% | 2 | 1912 | 36.73% | 2 |
1910 | 6.06% | 3 | 1910 | 56.06% | 3 | 1912 | 97.96% | 3 | 1913 | 37.50% | 3 |
1912 | 4.08% | 4 | 1912 | 55.10% | 4 | 1913 | 93.75% | 4 | 1911 | 41.67% | 4 |
总计 | 7.58% | 总计 | 57.82% | 总计 | 97.63% | 总计 | 36.02% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学丹凤校区2015年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
1509 | 8.89% | 1 | 1509 | 42.22% | 1 | 1501 | 98.36% | 1 | 1501 | 54.10% | 1 |
1501 | 6.56% | 2 | 1501 | 39.34% | 2 | 1509 | 97.78% | 2 | 1509 | 71.11% | 2 |
总计 | 7.55% | 总计 | 40.57% | 总计 | 98.11% | 总计 | 61.32% | ||||
2020年度江苏省南通市海安市 海安市明道小学丹凤校区2020年级 学生体质健康、近视率排名 | |||||||||||
优秀率排名 | 优良率排名 | 合格率排名 | 近视率排名 | ||||||||
单位 | 优秀率 | 排名 | 单位 | 优良率 | 排名 | 单位 | 合格率 | 排名 | 单位 | 近视率 | 排名 |
2012 | 2.33% | 1 | 2012 | 34.88% | 1 | 2013 | 95.65% | 1 | 2014 | 13.33% | 1 |
2014 | 2.22% | 2 | 2011 | 32.61% | 2 | 2012 | 95.35% | 2 | 2013 | 17.39% | 2 |
2011 | 0.00% | 3 | 2013 | 26.09% | 3 | 2014 | 86.67% | 3 | 2012 | 18.60% | 3 |
2013 | 0.00% | 3 | 2014 | 20.00% | 4 | 2011 | 84.78% | 4 | 2011 | 21.74% | 4 |
总计 | 1.11% | 总计 | 28.33% | 总计 | 90.56% | 总计 | 17.78% |
2019明道汇总 | 2020明道汇总 | |||||||||
年级 | 不及格 | 及格 | 良好 | 优秀 | 年级 | 不及格 | 及格 | 良好 | 优秀 | |
一年级 | 0.00% | 66.42% | 29.89% | 3.69% | 一年级 | 0.18% | 51.28% | 41.42% | 7.12% | |
二年级 | 2.22% | 64.14% | 29.21% | 4.44% | 二年级 | 0.92% | 50.83% | 38.26% | 9.98% | |
三年级 | 2.33% | 59.83% | 31.50% | 6.34% | 三年级 | 2.23% | 61.34% | 30.30% | 6.13% | |
四年级 | 4.33% | 67.32% | 24.68% | 3.68% | 四年级 | 3.18% | 56.69% | 36.94% | 3.18% | |
五年级 | 8.99% | 72.81% | 17.98% | 0.22% | 五年级 | 2.39% | 67.39% | 28.04% | 2.17% | |
六年级 | 4.71% | 66.59% | 26.01% | 2.69% | 六年级 | 21.22% | 62.98% | 14.90% | 0.90% | |
总计 | 3.58% | 66.07% | 26.78% | 3.58% | 总计 | 4.60% | 58.05% | 32.19% | 5.16% | |
2019明道汇总 | 2020明道汇总 | |||||||||
班级名称 | 不及格 | 及格 | 良好 | 优秀 | 班级名称 | 不及格 | 及格 | 良好 | 优秀 | |
1401 | 1.82% | 72.73% | 25.45% | 0.00% | 1501 | 22.00% | 66.00% | 12.00% | 0.00% | |
1402 | 0.00% | 69.09% | 27.27% | 3.64% | 1502 | 22.45% | 63.27% | 12.24% | 2.04% | |
1403 | 3.64% | 67.27% | 25.45% | 3.64% | 1503 | 26.00% | 54.00% | 20.00% | 0.00% | |
1404 | 8.62% | 68.97% | 18.97% | 3.45% | 1504 | 20.00% | 62.00% | 18.00% | 0.00% | |
1405 | 3.57% | 64.29% | 26.79% | 5.36% | 1505 | 18.37% | 59.18% | 20.41% | 2.04% | |
1406 | 0.00% | 75.47% | 24.53% | 0.00% | 1506 | 32.65% | 55.10% | 12.24% | 0.00% | |
1407 | 10.71% | 64.29% | 21.43% | 3.57% | 1507 | 10.20% | 75.51% | 10.20% | 4.08% | |
1408 | 8.62% | 51.72% | 37.93% | 1.72% | 1508 | 16.33% | 67.35% | 16.33% | 0.00% | |
1501 | 0.00% | 85.71% | 14.29% | 0.00% | 1509 | 22.92% | 64.58% | 12.50% | 0.00% | |
1502 | 12.50% | 71.43% | 16.07% | 0.00% | 1601 | 0.00% | 66.67% | 33.33% | 0.00% | |
1503 | 16.07% | 64.29% | 19.64% | 0.00% | 1602 | 5.88% | 56.86% | 31.37% | 5.88% | |
1504 | 16.07% | 62.50% | 21.43% | 0.00% | 1603 | 1.92% | 69.23% | 26.92% | 1.92% | |
1505 | 7.14% | 67.86% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 1604 | 1.92% | 59.62% | 30.77% | 7.69% | |
1506 | 3.64% | 89.09% | 7.27% | 0.00% | 1605 | 1.96% | 78.43% | 19.61% | 0.00% | |
1507 | 12.96% | 75.93% | 11.11% | 0.00% | 1606 | 0.00% | 78.43% | 21.57% | 0.00% | |
1508 | 3.57% | 66.07% | 28.57% | 1.79% | 1607 | 5.77% | 65.38% | 28.85% | 0.00% | |
1601 | 5.45% | 60.00% | 27.27% | 7.27% | 1608 | 2.00% | 68.00% | 30.00% | 0.00% | |
1602 | 5.08% | 57.63% | 30.51% | 6.78% | 1609 | 2.00% | 64.00% | 30.00% | 4.00% | |
1603 | 5.17% | 68.97% | 24.14% | 1.72% | 1701 | 3.85% | 55.77% | 38.46% | 1.92% | |
1604 | 1.69% | 62.71% | 28.81% | 6.78% | 1702 | 7.69% | 53.85% | 36.54% | 1.92% | |
1605 | 3.64% | 69.09% | 27.27% | 0.00% | 1703 | 3.92% | 41.18% | 47.06% | 7.84% | |
1606 | 3.51% | 73.68% | 19.30% | 3.51% | 1704 | 0.00% | 66.04% | 32.08% | 1.89% | |
1607 | 8.77% | 70.18% | 19.30% | 1.75% | 1705 | 2.00% | 54.00% | 38.00% | 6.00% | |
1608 | 1.61% | 75.81% | 20.97% | 1.61% | 1706 | 1.85% | 51.85% | 40.74% | 5.56% | |
1701 | 0.00% | 61.11% | 37.04% | 1.85% | 1707 | 0.00% | 59.26% | 37.04% | 3.70% | |
1702 | 0.00% | 59.62% | 32.69% | 7.69% | 1708 | 7.69% | 65.38% | 26.92% | 0.00% | |
1703 | 1.96% | 50.98% | 33.33% | 13.73% | 1709 | 1.89% | 62.26% | 35.85% | 0.00% | |
1704 | 1.89% | 64.15% | 28.30% | 5.66% | 1801 | 1.85% | 59.26% | 31.48% | 7.41% | |
1705 | 2.00% | 66.00% | 26.00% | 6.00% | 1802 | 0.00% | 51.85% | 40.74% | 7.41% | |
1706 | 1.85% | 53.70% | 35.19% | 9.26% | 1803 | 3.70% | 62.96% | 31.48% | 1.85% | |
1707 | 7.41% | 66.67% | 24.07% | 1.85% | 1804 | 3.64% | 67.27% | 25.45% | 3.64% | |
1708 | 3.85% | 57.69% | 28.85% | 9.62% | 1805 | 1.85% | 59.26% | 35.19% | 3.70% | |
1709 | 1.89% | 58.49% | 37.74% | 1.89% | 1806 | 0.00% | 59.62% | 34.62% | 5.77% | |
1801 | 1.61% | 72.58% | 17.74% | 8.06% | 1807 | 1.85% | 59.26% | 27.78% | 11.11% | |
1802 | 1.64% | 54.10% | 39.34% | 4.92% | 1808 | 1.85% | 55.56% | 38.89% | 3.70% | |
1803 | 1.67% | 58.33% | 31.67% | 8.33% | 1809 | 3.70% | 66.67% | 20.37% | 9.26% | |
1804 | 1.69% | 71.19% | 27.12% | 0.00% | 1810 | 3.77% | 71.70% | 16.98% | 7.55% | |
1805 | 1.67% | 61.67% | 36.67% | 0.00% | 1901 | 0.00% | 37.04% | 42.59% | 20.37% | |
1806 | 1.69% | 79.66% | 15.25% | 3.39% | 1902 | 0.00% | 51.85% | 38.89% | 9.26% | |
1807 | 1.69% | 67.80% | 23.73% | 6.78% | 1903 | 0.00% | 50.00% | 44.44% | 5.56% | |
1808 | 1.61% | 48.39% | 43.55% | 6.45% | 1904 | 1.85% | 44.44% | 42.59% | 11.11% | |
1809 | 6.78% | 64.41% | 27.12% | 1.69% | 1905 | 0.00% | 55.56% | 33.33% | 11.11% | |
1901 | 0.00% | 72.13% | 22.95% | 4.92% | 1906 | 1.82% | 41.82% | 50.91% | 5.45% | |
1902 | 0.00% | 70.00% | 26.67% | 3.33% | 1907 | 1.85% | 59.26% | 25.93% | 12.96% | |
1903 | 0.00% | 67.21% | 27.87% | 4.92% | 1908 | 3.70% | 61.11% | 29.63% | 5.56% | |
1904 | 0.00% | 50.00% | 40.00% | 10.00% | 1909 | 0.00% | 51.85% | 40.74% | 7.41% | |
1905 | 0.00% | 65.00% | 33.33% | 1.67% | 1910 | 0.00% | 55.56% | 33.33% | 11.11% | |
1906 | 0.00% | 70.49% | 27.87% | 1.64% | 2001 | 0.00% | 56.36% | 34.55% | 9.09% | |
1907 | 0.00% | 67.80% | 27.12% | 5.08% | 2002 | 0.00% | 60.00% | 36.36% | 3.64% | |
1908 | 0.00% | 62.71% | 35.59% | 1.69% | 2003 | 1.82% | 54.55% | 41.82% | 1.82% | |
1909 | 0.00% | 72.13% | 27.87% | 0.00% | 2004 | 0.00% | 66.67% | 31.48% | 1.85% | |
总计 | 3.58% | 66.07% | 26.78% | 3.58% | 2005 | 0.00% | 56.36% | 40.00% | 3.64% | |
2006 | 0.00% | 45.45% | 43.64% | 10.91% | ||||||
2007 | 0.00% | 43.64% | 56.36% | 0.00% | ||||||
2008 | 0.00% | 50.00% | 37.04% | 12.96% | ||||||
2009 | 0.00% | 43.64% | 45.45% | 10.91% | ||||||
2010 | 0.00% | 36.36% | 47.27% | 16.36% | ||||||
总计 | 4.60% | 58.05% | 32.19% | 5.16% | ||||||
2019丹凤汇总 | 2020丹凤汇总 | |||||||||
年级 | 不及格 | 及格 | 良好 | 优秀 | 年级 | 不及格 | 及格 | 良好 | 优秀 | |
一年级 | 4.19% | 54.45% | 39.27% | 2.09% | 一年级 | 9.50% | 62.57% | 26.82% | 1.12% | |
二年级 | 0.00% | 25.83% | 51.66% | 22.52% | 二年级 | 2.38% | 39.52% | 50.48% | 7.62% | |
三年级 | 0.00% | 12.50% | 57.95% | 29.55% | 三年级 | 8.82% | 45.88% | 35.88% | 9.41% | |
四年级 | 0.00% | 13.04% | 56.52% | 30.43% | 四年级 | 0.00% | 28.97% | 44.86% | 26.17% | |
五年级 | 4.21% | 54.74% | 36.84% | 4.21% | 五年级 | 3.49% | 25.58% | 47.67% | 23.26% | |
六年级 | 3.85% | 60.26% | 25.64% | 10.26% | 六年级 | 1.92% | 56.73% | 33.65% | 7.69% | |
总计 | 2.23% | 38.99% | 44.35% | 14.43% | 总计 | 4.91% | 44.98% | 39.60% | 10.51% | |
2019丹凤汇总 | 2020丹凤汇总 | |||||||||
班级名称 | 不及格 | 及格 | 良好 | 优秀 | 班级名称 | 不及格 | 及格 | 良好 | 优秀 | |
1401 | 2.50% | 55.00% | 30.00% | 12.50% | 1501 | 1.69% | 57.63% | 33.90% | 6.78% | |
1409 | 5.26% | 65.79% | 21.05% | 7.89% | 1509 | 2.22% | 55.56% | 33.33% | 8.89% | |
1501 | 8.33% | 47.92% | 39.58% | 4.17% | 1601 | 3.92% | 19.61% | 54.90% | 21.57% | |
1509 | 0.00% | 61.70% | 34.04% | 4.26% | 1609 | 2.86% | 34.29% | 37.14% | 25.71% | |
1601 | 0.00% | 5.88% | 64.71% | 29.41% | 1701 | 0.00% | 28.57% | 47.62% | 23.81% | |
1609 | 0.00% | 20.00% | 48.57% | 31.43% | 1710 | 0.00% | 29.55% | 40.91% | 29.55% | |
1701 | 0.00% | 11.11% | 57.78% | 31.11% | 1810 | 7.69% | 38.46% | 43.08% | 10.77% | |
1710 | 0.00% | 13.95% | 58.14% | 27.91% | 1811 | 6.06% | 42.42% | 39.39% | 12.12% | |
1810 | 0.00% | 16.28% | 44.19% | 39.53% | 1812 | 11.43% | 54.29% | 25.71% | 8.57% | |
1811 | 0.00% | 35.29% | 50.00% | 14.71% | 1813 | 10.81% | 54.05% | 29.73% | 5.41% | |
1812 | 0.00% | 27.78% | 50.00% | 22.22% | 1910 | 1.54% | 41.54% | 50.77% | 6.15% | |
1813 | 0.00% | 26.32% | 63.16% | 10.53% | 1911 | 0.00% | 37.50% | 50.00% | 12.50% | |
1910 | 2.13% | 63.83% | 34.04% | 0.00% | 1912 | 2.04% | 42.86% | 51.02% | 4.08% | |
1911 | 0.00% | 42.55% | 53.19% | 4.26% | 1913 | 6.25% | 35.42% | 50.00% | 8.33% | |
1912 | 8.16% | 57.14% | 32.65% | 2.04% | 2011 | 15.56% | 53.33% | 31.11% | 0.00% | |
1913 | 6.25% | 54.17% | 37.50% | 2.08% | 2012 | 4.65% | 60.47% | 32.56% | 2.33% | |
总计 | 2.23% | 38.99% | 44.35% | 14.43% | 2013 | 4.35% | 69.57% | 26.09% | 0.00% | |
2014 | 13.33% | 66.67% | 17.78% | 2.22% | ||||||
总计 | 4.91% | 44.98% | 39.60% | 10.51% | ||||||
2019-2020视力不良统计 | |||||||||
年份:2020 | |||||||||
名称 | 受检人数 | 轻度视力不良 | 中度视力不良 | 重度视力不良 | 视力不良 | ||||
人数 | 率(%) | 人数 | 率(%) | 人数 | 率(%) | 人数 | 率(%) | ||
6 | 589 | 103 | 17.49 | 71 | 12.05 | 7 | 1.19 | 181 | 30.73 |
7 | 698 | 143 | 20.49 | 68 | 9.74 | 17 | 2.44 | 228 | 32.66 |
8 | 582 | 78 | 13.4 | 88 | 15.12 | 25 | 4.3 | 191 | 32.82 |
9 | 511 | 52 | 10.18 | 167 | 32.68 | 93 | 18.2 | 312 | 61.06 |
10 | 475 | 40 | 8.42 | 116 | 24.42 | 218 | 45.89 | 374 | 78.74 |
11 | 502 | 50 | 9.96 | 105 | 20.92 | 250 | 49.8 | 405 | 80.68 |
12 | 89 | 10 | 11.24 | 17 | 19.1 | 44 | 49.44 | 71 | 79.78 |
13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
999 | 3447 | 476 | 13.81 | 632 | 18.33 | 654 | 18.97 | 1762 | 51.12 |
2020-2021视力不良统计 | |||||||||
年份:2021 | |||||||||
名称 | 受检人数 | 轻度视力不良 | 中度视力不良 | 重度视力不良 | 视力不良 | ||||
人数 | 率(%) | 人数 | 率(%) | 人数 | 率(%) | 人数 | 率(%) | ||
6 | 447 | 105 | 23.49 | 70 | 15.66 | 15 | 3.36 | 190 | 42.51 |
7 | 759 | 164 | 21.61 | 114 | 15.02 | 55 | 7.25 | 333 | 43.87 |
8 | 733 | 88 | 12.01 | 197 | 26.88 | 108 | 14.73 | 393 | 53.62 |
9 | 605 | 69 | 11.4 | 136 | 22.48 | 188 | 31.07 | 393 | 64.96 |
10 | 553 | 53 | 9.58 | 109 | 19.71 | 285 | 51.54 | 447 | 80.83 |
11 | 543 | 46 | 8.47 | 96 | 17.68 | 340 | 62.62 | 482 | 88.77 |
12 | 182 | 11 | 6.04 | 34 | 18.68 | 117 | 64.29 | 162 | 89.01 |
13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 1 | 50 | 2 | 100 |
999 | 3824 | 536 | 14.02 | 757 | 19.8 | 1109 | 29 | 2402 | 62.81 |
用户登录